DemonGoddess

here

The author deleted her content, then asked to be deleted from the archive.

She's got a link to her personal site on the profile, perhaps her site will have it.

Jade-Tatsu

Story

Nope, the admin (me) never got anything even suggesting theft or anything regarding the story. Which means neither did the mods...

As we've discussed here, the REASON reviewers of quality are scarce is because we feel the authors don't necessarily want to hear what we have to say.

We have a promo forum ya know. Promote a Story. You add that particular data to your post.

you're welcome

added here

merged

Prompts lackey lachrymose licentiousness Rules Happy Writing! This topic will autolock at 11:59 pm EDT 8-31

For me to add pair specific categories, you need to show me 5 pre-existing of the same pair in the archive.

added here

There are quite a few who QC before allowing addition.

dupe nuked

finished

done

merged story, it belongs in books, set in Anita Blake's universe

Not to mention it's not even FINISHED yet.

merged

Totally agree with Cal. Besides, the stuff that we leave here should certainly point to the fact that we don't QC, nor censor.

I actually didn't create the term. It's been around for quite awhile.

fanpoodles are not so much empty reviews, although that's what they tend to leave, is meaningless reviews, but the clique of reviewers who "squee" for no apparent reason, and review and make popular some absolutely DREADFUL writing. Yet, because it's (the story) for a popular pair, for example, it'll get reviewed and highly rated whether or not it actually deserves it. What's even worse, is that often, the writers who HAVE all the fanpoodle following tend to be rather divaish in behavior. To me, they don't so much seem to be writing for the craft of it, but more for the ego boost. I suppose as someone who cut their reading teeth on the likes of Homer, Asimov, and Tolkien, I tend to be a tad picky...