JayDee

Hi there, As the forum PM system does not like the rename tokens, I have registered a new account in the name JayDee which is close to my two letter pen-name of JD. If this is okay, then when the JayDee account is authorised by the forum system/moderation team, can I have enough time to copy my banked naughty points over to the new account (say, two or three days with timezones as they are and maybe not getting back on) and then just have this account (JoanDoe) deleted, as I won't need to use it any more and it'll save people accidently emailing this one instead of the other? Thanks for your help with this, apologises if I should not have registered the new account.

That's the second time somebody has raised that as an issue. I've renamed my account back to the correct name, see if it makes a difference in future. I might look into registering a new forum account as 'JayDee' and simply stop using Joandoe. Having my post count drop from 71 to 0 won't be the end of the world! Edit - Eh, I've gone ahead with registering the new account. Won't have access until(if) it is approved, and then I'll get stop using this one.

I'm sure you'll fit in just fine! Eloquence goes a long way

I remember GAFF when the point of the forums was to be funny. It wasn't about serious reviews or constructive criticism or even, in any real sense, being fair to writers or stories. This was a long time ago. Back at a place called voyboards, and maybe the early orangey boards. And yes, it would be cruel and occasionally pretentious but generally, very, very, funny. Then it was kind of... the funny users mostly drifted away, about three score 4channers joined up, and the rest were 14 year olds writing in depth critiques about why someone else from their obscure or not so obscure fandom was just the worst ("This anime character would never consider this anime character as a snugglebuddy!")- without a single damn joke. Many of the 14 year olds would also have a proud link to their own fanfiction story page, where you could see they themselves had hundreds o badly written tosh. See, the point of the porn without plot reviews was that they could be side splittingly hilarious if handled by somebody with a sense of humor. There was one of Superjizz' stories got a review that I damn near wet myself reading. I figure at least half of the reviewers/readers back then were still masturbating furiously over the stories, but they took 'em apart for the cruel amusement of all concerned. Then the too-young crowd was all over the place and they just figured "pr0n = ick" ...and now it seems that even the over-ernest reviewers have gone, with very few new reviews being posted, and the forum exists purely as a site for people to talk about what random shit, like any other general 'net forum or start threads just to post some livejournal level opinion of no interest even to their friendslist. And that's why I hardly visit these days and can't recommend the place. No sense of humour any more.

Well, if it's a low fat ice cream cone...

I agree, it's nicely done - giving the thoughts and reasoning in a rational and intelligent manner. My version would likely be "CHAPTER 2 HAS CHARACTERS GETTING BITS CUT OFF, AND RE-INSERTED ELSEWHERE. DON'T LIKE, DON'T READ."

Ahh! An unforeseen consequence of using the Display Name re-name from the shop.

Chocolate dipping? Also, Kip, Keith, Agaib - I agree wholeheartedly.

http://cartoon.adult-fanfiction.org/review....mp;no=544189379 Screen stretcher seems to be id # 3000016703

Testify! Same thing happens with me all the damn time, and I don't even write about kids!

Jaxxy, given the same story is linked, and similar comments made re: TOS, could the person who emailed you be the same guest posting on the forum here? looking for 'open dialogue? Also, I suspect they have mis-understood your TOS, as they don't seem to understand it is users who need to demonstrate a belief that nothing is offensive/obscene to use the service, or else not use the site?

I originally wrote these up for another forum over a couple of months, and decided it wouldn't hurt to re-post here. I figured I'd also be best keeping my requests/suggestions in one thread, as that way it's easier for people to avoid them - given the nature of the kind of thing I read/write being somewhat, uh, niche. Request #1 Marvel Comics: Marvel: Ruins Up there in the top five most depressing superhero comics ever... Bit of an old one now, too. High quality art though. Anyway, in Ruins Jean Grey had a cameo as a hooker and tried to get business from Nick Fury and Phil Sheldon. Nick Fury shot her dead instead. I would like to suggest a story where he fucks her first (Marvel MAX 'Fury is a great big whoremonger' style) and then shoots her to avoid paying. The total hopelessness of both characters in the Ruins universe would allow for good examination of the self disgust they both seemingly feel, expanded during the act to the point of murder. Plus, I find the idea of Jean Grey as a twenty dollar street whore totally hot. Request #2 Another request based on an infamous comic: DC Comics - Warrior #42 Long ago and far away, DC Comics decided that there was only room for one proper Green Lantern, the often awesome Kyle Rayner (Well, I like him!). So Guy Gardner, after a bit of dossing around, discovered he had himself alien heritage and could grow weapons out of his body. Became Warrior. You probably know that if you've read this far. Anyway, Warrior #42 was the "Gal" Gardner issue, in which Guy's then-foe Dementor - a big chunk of snot lookin' thing with tentacles - turned him into a woman. An incredibly hot woman. And had him parade around in various outfits including one panel of a maid's uniform. Now I've jogged your memory of Guy Gardner's transsexual escapade, my request: Please can somebody write a story where Dementor took a further step in his humiliation of "Gal" Gardner by raping her, forcing her to apparantly enjoy it, filming it all, and then putting the footage on the internet (or, this being early nineties, sending a copy to the Daily Planet, Galaxy Broadcasting etc?) Maybe even end it with "Gal" Gardner forced into prostitution with Dementor as an incredibly un-superfly pimp daddy? That's my request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Request #3 A somewhat more recent comic request... DC Comics - Shadowpact In one of the issues of the now finished Shadowpact, Detective Chimp was shown searching the internet for furries so he could try to get a little action, as there weren't any super intelligent female chimps around. I'd like to suggest a story where he ends up hooking up with fellow Shadowpact member Nightshade instead - maybe also a threesome with Shadowpact's occasional guest, uh, star Rex the Wonder Dog? Thanks for considering this suggestion! I recall somebody suggesting to Detective Chip back during the Day of Vengeance miniseries that Nightshade was in to him, and he shot it down because she wasn't a chimp. However, he'd only been sober a couple of days then (as I think he told Black Alice's father) and maybe wasn't thinking straight - also, the fact he was later on the internet looking for furries shows a change of heart. (...I bet Guy Gardner never needs to trawl the internet for girls. Shadowpact superheroes just don't get any respect...) If anybody wants to write one of these, please PM me when it's done so I can read it!

Yeah, but it's not really accurate to describe an episode like Spock's Brain as Classic. I for one can't do it without laughing. That's one case where TOSS is more accurate than TOS....

Hi, this story was completed a while back and is a oneshot story of several thousand words. Please if you like the story as described below would you go and read it. Title: Mike Rapes A Dyke Author: Jaydee/JD Rating: Adult+ Summary: Naive teenage lesbian Lily Flynn tried to use Michael Van Dijk, but he used her all night long instead. Content Codes: Abuse, Anal, BDSM, Bond, ChallengeFic, COMPLETE, F/F, Humil, Language, M/F, N/C, OC, Oneshot, Oral, Other, S&M, Toys Feedback: This would be gratefully appreciated and accepted. Fandom: Original > Erotica > General URL: http://original.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600093572 Thank you for reading this promotion! JD

Out of idle curiousity, and if you can still remember, what made you choose strumpet?

I have a deck, but we pretty much leave out the Major Arcana and the Knights and play regular 52 card games with it. Keep meaning to learn some of the full deck games (e.g. Ottocento - if a version exists to correspond with my deck), just for the history behind them.

Hi, this story was completed today, and is a single chapter oneshot story of only 2745 words excluding disclaimer etc. Please if you like the story as described below would you go and read it. Title: Rhode Island Redneck Author: JayDee/JD Rating: Adult++ Summary: When Peter Griffin decides to be a redneck, he takes the lifestyle - and his daughter, Meg - all the way. Content Codes: Anal, COMPLETE, HJ, Inc, M/F, Oneshot, Oral, PWP Feedback: This would be gratefully appreciated and accepted - particularly negative feedback as I find it useful for improvement, but I am not choosy. Fandom: Cartoons > Family Guy URL: http://cartoon.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600091567 Thank you for a few minutes of your life. JD

Necrophiliac speed dating?

Re: Marvel - I don't know of many comics fans who would use 'Marvel Family' in most contexts to refer to Marvel Comics' various Captain Marvels (Mar-Vell, Monica Rambeau et al) or Marvel Comics itself, but if there is room for confusion then the category for DC would surely be some variation on 'Shazam!' rather than 'Captain Marvel'- as this has featured in the titles of most of DC's Marvel Family comics, for Billy, Mary, Freddy and the rest. Only Marvel Comics has the right to market a comic with the title 'Captain Marvel' See here for why. As a kind of extra test of public opinion, Wikipedia deals with 'Marvel Family' as the DC comics/original Fawcett Comics versions of all the characters with no mention of Marvel Comics - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Family - and if there was room for confusion then the nerds who edit the damn thing would surely have set it as a disambiguation page by now.

That's great - thanks for your help! And yes, I have an additional note on all three to say they are used with prior permission.

Hi there, Under 'Originals' I have three strories using an artist's original characters. These characters apppear in much of the creator’s non-fanart that I have seen and have no basis in any fandom or on any celebrity (They are not, for example, OCs for Harry Potter). My three stories were written and posted with the creator's permission, and the first was a direct request. On that basis, I posted them under Originals with my standard fanfiction disclaimer modified to state that "I don’t own any of Wolverine’s original characters and make no profit from this story." So my first question is - Is the Originals section correct for stories using another creator's original characters, and if not, where should they go? The reason I have this question is that When I re-read the Disclaimers FAQ before my post in the weak/missing disclaimers board, I noted that under the section for Originals disclaimers it states "Original fiction one would expect to have an author's OWN characters," and the disclaimer should say as such. My section question is: If stories using (with permission) another creator's original characters in this way are acceptable under the Originals subdomain are acceptable, can the disclaimers FAQ be added to, to confirm how you want them disclaimed? Thanks (I checked through and could not find this being covered elsewhere).

Thanks for clarifying that DemonGoddess061! I think I posted my edit above at the same time as you were posting. Internet co-incidences always get me like that

Agaib, per the article I linked: Here's another recent article on the case, again re-affirming my prior point about the lack of convictions for text only: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburgh...g/s_581761.html So as noted in the previous article, it was Karen Fletcher's Agoraphobia that led to her voluntarily pleading guility. There's no precedent under law at all. Has there been a conviction on text only in America for anything ever that wasn't overturned by the supreme court on freedom of speech grounds? Holocaust denial maybe?

Hi, following your allcaps note at the start that you are not taking into account "in story" disclaimers this post is simply directed at the moderator who checks them rather than yourself - In my stories linked above the disclaimer states: "I don't own any of [copyright holders]'s characters and make no profit from this story" ....and so is compliant with site requirements. However, as I prefer a longer disclaimer for clarity I put it at the top of my stories rather than in the limited text box. I also feel that as my disclaimer is right at the top it is not 'in story' as it is clearly labelled disclaimer prior to the story text. Although I do get what Miranda Pixie means by that - as I put "Full Disclaimer Below" in the green box, and add my long-form disclaimer to the start of every chapter. I also believe I queried some time back if this format was acceptable, and was told that it was. I cannot seem to find a link to this however. Edit ...and on reflection, that may have been under the old moderation team. All my fanfiction disclaimers now amended. Two disclaimers saying the same thing cannot hurt after all. Especially when, based on my firefly flames, no bugger reads them.

Your third article was indeed about Karen Fletcher, butfrom 2006. My point is that it is misleading to post articles that are two years out of date when more current details of a case or legal standing exist. Even that one you've linked there is from January this year, with just a note added more recently on the outcome of the case. The article I linked from May 2008 explains that she was to plead guilty this month only because of her agarophobia, and the article also explains that there have been no convictions on text alone, nor really any effective test case before the courts as they are still wanting one. That being the case the point of law has been not been tested, so it would not be set precedent. In other words, I see no reason not to stand by my post.