DemonGoddess

y'know, if it comes down to it, legal action; consider the ACLU as a possibility. After all, what they're about is to protect and preserve the Constitution. Think about it, they've taken on cases over the years that have been more than a little controversial, all in an effort to protect the consititutional rights of people. Including, if you remember; people like Madalyn Murray O'Hair for her rights as an atheist, and a chapter of the Nazi party in this country to be able to exercise their right to free assembly. Yes, the Nazi thing REALLY bothered me when it happened, however, the ACLU was protecting those individuals' RIGHTS under the Constitution. So, did I agree that the Nazi party should've done that (marched in Skokie)? HELL NO. BUT, I did at the time, and still do believe that the ACLU was right in protecting those civil liberties.

Absolutely it can be added to. Right now, it's very brief, and yes, it certainly DOES need expanded a bit. As long as you have the artist's permission to use the characters in your writing, state that, and it should cover it all. Yes, it should still be in originals. I'll leave this here so I remember to make time to work on the disclaimers FAQ a bit more, since you asked for additions to it.

you might want to read about the cleanup project a bit. I'll get to these when we get to that subdomain. Still working in Buffy.

--Joandoe as long as you've listed it as "full disclaimer below" and it does indeed meet the requirements, yes, it's fine. ---Miranda Pixie thanks for posting these. The authors do have the posted grace period to correct things, and as long as it can be gotten from the text of the disclaimer that they 1. don't own whatever fandom they're writing about and 2. not making money; they and we are protected. As I said in the admin post, the stories will start being hidden for non compliance. Also, I figure a "review" pointing where the disclaimer needs correction from an admin user will help as well. However, I don't plan on doing those for another few days yet. I figured to give them all at least a week to read it and comply before I started playing "tag" with all those stories.

the sub subs for that section will be added when we get there.

urrrgh it's dead again

done. last link is a very different problem, and will be resolved too

deleting 37131 from Het>Buffy/Spike(William) is in the sort sheets, not the master sheet, so delete from sorted not yet updated. deleting 544196906 from Het>Buffy/Spike(William) is in the sort sheets, not the master sheet, so delete from sorted not yet updated.

thanks for letting me know, was planning on starting with the double/triple posts already found. But, gotta sleep first.

Gotta tell ya, when I went over the list I generated yesterday of improperly disclaimed stories, I was very happy to see that enough of you took what I said seriously, and fixed 'em. So, thanks to all of you who've taken the time to correct the disclaimers

What the hell. May as well add my thoughts to this. First of all, while there is much that has been added to the archive that I personally would never read, for my to demand it's removal would be childish at best, and certainly not in agreement with what I clicked to agree to when I signed up in the fiction portal. If I don't like a subject matter, I don't read it. It really IS that simple for me. Secondly, you've put me in a position of authority where in the process of cleaning up the archive, I do indeed have the ability to remove stuff at will. I've not done that, nor will I, regardless of whether or not I like the subject matter. If I were exercising what my opinions dictate to me, on the basis of QC ALONE there is much I would've deleted by now. That's not even getting into likes/dislikes of subject matter and deleting for that reason. I agree with everyone else. Don't bow down to the attempt at intimidation.

All of her content has been removed. After I get a bit of sleep, and then hopefully after I get home from work tomorrow, I can get on the other part I have planned. If not, it'll be on my next off day. In the meantime, the important part is done, in that the plagiarist and all her content have been removed.

It's a great idea. Would certainly be helpful in my current project as well. I'll be sure to have this added to our 'todo' list for the new software.

don't care so much about the reviews. it's the fact that they consistently IGNORE what was set up here months ago. It's in the damn TOS even.

jeeeez. doesn't anyone bother to read an admin post??? np, they'll be nuked after I do my forum stuff

p 13 544208028 stretched p 2 544202908 squished p 1-42 544201718 A/N, p 4, 7 544185721 squished p 1-22 544172326 look at p 1-8 to be sure html upload is not corrupted

Here's the thing, if you paid attention, the reviews were MERGED from the duplicates, as well as the hits and ratings. The only place I don't do that, is if it's cross posted across subdomains.

merge data from 1 chappie into 5 chappie, delete 1 chappie 1 chapter version 5 chapter version

26 chapter 27 chapter merge shorter into longer

you're quite welcome! Well, I have something in mind for the persistent buggers. The Hall of Shame isn't just for plagiarists.......after several mails (when the change was first made) and countless deletions from the same few....there's going to be a few who end up there as spammers

Actually, since this has to do with your writing, you'd put it elsewhere (it'll be moved to there). THESE forums are for reporting instances of whatever is listed as the title of the forum. If you read the forum titles, it'll help you place your posts in the areas where they belong

IF, we can make the new version mobile friendly we will. However, that's not a priority at the moment. So, we'll add this to the list of seeing if it'll work that way. For the forum, on your mobile, I believe you need to use the LoFi version.

more like a slip of the fingers....I'll get it taken care of.