DemonGoddess

Scattergram remove extra word gobbledygook html Daughters of Darkness wordord

Example disclaimer- The Amelia Peabody series belongs to Elizabeth Peters. I do not make any money from the writing of this story. First section is the fandom, meaning the book TITLE you're writing from, or the book SERIES. The second part is where you state you make no money from the story.

the archive only accepts documents ending in .htm or .html, or .txt What you need to do is convert the document to html, STRIP the bloated html tags out, and then upload it. It's important that you do that, as otherwise the upload still won't work quite right. To edit out the extra html, open the file in notepad or some other plain text editor. That way you see all the code that Word inserts. This FAQ will show you the allowable tags

that would be an orphan story. We've actually cleaned those OUT of the sub domains we're working in for cleanup and will be deleting them in all the other sub domains as well. Some of the kiddies like to keep coming back I guess, but we still make 'em go away.....

as long as the review isn't a flame, it's a good thing. Perhaps then they'll actually post where they're supposed to. I'm not holding my breath, but it's certainly worth a try.

Have you looked in your author panel? Obviously not. If so, you'd see the story is STILL there. As to the correction required, it is indeed required. The story will remain in hiding until the disclaimer is set to the standards as specified. It IS a reasonable policy in what is required. That you choose to not fulfill the requirements is on you, not any of the mods who have to look for all this and the multitude of other things that are looked at and for every single day.

First of all, it's in the Terms of Service. Searches and the like are to be posted in forum. Period. Secondly, it was announced MONTHS ago that the pre-existing searches, challenges, requests and etc would be deleted, which they were for the most part. Now, we delete them as we find them, and will continue to do so. Look in the announcements portion of the forum, it's all there.

this would be slashwriter yet again, yes?

put "full disclaimer below (chapter 1)" and make it your very first paragraph IN Chapter 1. That way anyone who needs to look for it knows where to look for it. As to the field size, that will be changing in the future. This is part of the new software, which won't be ready for beta for another year, yet, so doesn't apply to this stuff we work with now. It's being changed to a text "blob" type field, which means that it more or less self adjusted as to what is input in the field for character count. I know there will still be a limit on characters, but if I remember right it will be doubled in size, if not more.

It's no prob, I understand the rant

Sorry I misunderstood part of what you said. To be honest, I only quickly read (up to my eyeballs in work at the moment) but did check the link, and corrected it in my document. Thanks for the heads up on that.

They're not deleted, they're hidden because the disclaimers are not correct. You can still access them from your user panel. In fact, one IS scheduled for deletion, should you choose to leave the flame in the disclaimer.

I've deleted stories from this user every day for the past 5 days, not including what you just posted. So, I think we can safely say this one is a spammer......and needs nuked entirely.

All we are asking (any mod, that is) is that you, the users, comply with the Terms of Service. Considering how many rules there aren't, that shouldn't be difficult.

ALL requests, searches, challenges and etc are deleted without notification.

The link to the FAQ is not broken. The archive does not allow dynamic linking, so the user must copy/paste any links to their browser address bar. What's being looked for, is that the disclaimer specifically disclaim the fandom (HP) itself. Not just the author. Granted, J.K. Rowling has only published Harry Potter, so far as I know, but, that is how we're doing it. Particularly as most authors publish more than one world, over time. Actually, if you look, I did indeed warn them. However, the users themselves can delete reviews at will. So, whether or not a warning is still in the review board or not, is ultimately in the hands of the users themselves. We DO keep record of where and when we warn people.

gone gone gone

One would think, after I don't know HOW many deletions, that the repeaters would get a clue

maybe Fairy Tales should be Brothers Grimm? Since those are the stories mentioned, I'm thinking.

hehe, it's in the works, actually. The backframe for the new stuff is in the process of being written. Without a strong backframe to a program, the end results (what the end user sees and uses) generally doesn't work well at all.

Here's one for all of you. I deleted the brat, because I found proof she is under 18. Now, in response to that, she decided to flame an admin announcement. Needless to say, she's being nuked yet again. sarah17 you are not WELCOME here. Not even when you turn 18 in October. We don't WANT people who feel the need to be abusive and have tantrums because they were caught out. initial age proof Review with flame, and statement of age, which DOES NOT MATCH her youtube profile (she says she's 20 there) As you can see, that is unacceptable behavior from any user. PERIOD. For obvious reasons, we do NOT want minors here. That is a danger to the site, if found, and left alone.

Unpleasant Dreams and Terrifying Nightmares in tv>misc, belongs in anime subdomain, Yami no Matsuei also, appears to have a format problem, missing data, probably not stripped of word html extras

it's not addressable with this software, except for the way you and I have been handling it already, unfortunately. HOWEVER, with the software that's in the process of being written, I and any other moderator will have tools in place (much like some of my forum tools) which will let me nuke 'em for good. Make it so they can't ever come BACK to the site.

You're right, there isn't one. I'll be sure to add this one with the other two I'm planning on adding as well.

that's pretty much where I was going with it.