Jump to content

DemonGoddess

Admin
  • Posts

    44,500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    214

Everything posted by DemonGoddess

  1. I believe there is already a text size adjuster built in.
  2. It was changed to where it showed a maximum of 30, to reduce query load drastically (for each review which is displayed, a query is executed). Stories where you have many, many reviews, tend to have their review boards load slowly, or not at all. This FIXES that, so it's no longer a problem. In fact, by giving one the option of showing up to 30 at a time, that's pretty much the limit of where we should ever be for query execution per page displayed. We noticed late last night that the sort order was reverse of what we wanted, so that'll be addressed I'd expect within the next few days. (Was intended to sort newest to oldest, it currently sorts oldest to newest, but as I said, this is temporary).
  3. Order of Business in Buffy>General goes to BtVS Crossovers>Anita Blake
  4. The update is complete from books through hp subdomains, and anime through inu so far. It's almost done.
  5. That's exactly why we insist on the fandom, rather than characters. Because by disclaiming it, you disclaim the characters, the world, and whatever else is involved WITH it. It's all inclusive. This helps to compensate for the inconvenience of the teeny tiny field we have to work with. Once we have that field resized, what I'm hoping to see is more creativity with 'em. I've seen some very, very FUNNY disclaimers in checking. In fact, it sparked an idea for further down the road, to see who can come up with the most original/funny/etc disclaimer while STILL covering the requirements. I bet with all the creative people we have here, we'll see stuff ranging from real groaner type stuff (puns and such) to some that are just so outright funny we'll all read 'em and laugh ALOT.
  6. Latest, if I'm remembering right, will display in the center block, so that there is also access to the main menu for each subdomain. Same thing with "next" and "previous" click points, just a bit of different placement.
  7. First, it should be available to you in your user panel, the story. What email address did you send to? I take care of this, and do check for corrections upon notification, and then the story is notated in our working document, and unhidden. I don't recall seeing an email from anyone with a user name resembling your forum name. I need the story title, and the subdomain it's in. Normally, you would indeed email that this has been corrected, but only if it's been hidden first. If a disclaimer is corrected before a story is hidden, we simply make note of it and that's the end of it for that story. In general, yes, if it's a minor TOS violation, once corrected, if mail notification is needed, that's how you would do that. Mail to this address: TOS_team@adult-fanfiction.org. Generally speaking, if a user is approached by a moderator via email in the first place, the response would be the using the same method. For the disclaimers, we tell you all, that once you've fixed it, delete the warn. In that for instance, no mail notification is needed.
  8. Yep, there are some minor coding changes being done at the moment. Some nice upgrades included with that as well, which you'll see once it's done.
  9. Heh. You'd be surprised how many "don't own, don't sue" we see each and every day. Consistently. Now, for the increase in the field size for reviews. Which, as I said is not something that'll happen YET. It's certainly something that will indeed happen. 240 characters is NOT ENOUGH space to be able to do what many of you would like to with the space. However, I don't anticipate the field change to be made until after the new stuff is ready for deployment. Having said that, it certainly wouldn't hurt to look at revisiting that as a minor change prior to finishing up the software in development. So, I will put that on our to do list, and next time manta2g and I are talking, we'll take a quick look at it as well.
  10. nah this is fine...I'll get it taken care of for ya
  11. As far as I know, we don't have a specific rule in place regarding holding a story hostage for reviews. However, the best action I can think of for it, is to ignore the user ENTIRELY. I mean, after all, they're after attention, yes? Don't give it to 'em. Now, in the past, I've gone off on users for exactly that sort of thing. Let 'em know just how immature I thought the behavior WAS (not here, elsewhere). Because it really is. I can think of nothing that will spoil a story for me faster than the writer doing that.
  12. Something to keep in mind with the disclaimers, is that by October 21st of last year, I'd gone through and corrected, subdomain by subdomain, with the exception of crossover stories, all stories in the archive, using a query per category. So, anything dated from 10/21/08 and before, SHOULD have been addressed and not be a problem (except crossovers, no time to individually edit each and every one of those). That was a rather time consuming task, as we have several subdomains with MULTIPLE fandoms in them as subcategories and/or top level categories. So each time the query was executed, it had to be modified to fit that particular subcategory, for wording. That was a one time thing when I did it. Just a few days ago, manta2g and I re-explored putting BACK the auto-disclaimer, which had been removed MONTHS before either one of us got into the code here. There's a very good reason as to why. The query structure involved is actually 2 versions ahead of what the archive is written in, so by doing that (it's not just a simple dropdown menu), it causes problems with the rest of the old code, which is just that. OLD and obsolete. So, we tinkered around for a bit, and sorry to say, we cannot reinstate that function in THIS version of the software. Wish we could, it sure would save alot of headaches for everyone. However, if we tried to, it would in all probability crash the current software. NOT an option. This function will be put in place in the new software. We'd already planned for it. Now, as far as looking at disclaimers every day, that's not the only thing we're looking at and for. That's just the start of it, actually. We also look for minors, trolls, plagiarists (sometimes one of us recognizes a story, and remember it belonging it to someone else) and other things like that. As to the size of the disclaimer field, yes, it will be increased, but not in this version of the software.
  13. Ah ok. I looked it up in our worksheet for this, and it's listed as not having a profit statement added to the disclaimer. That would be why it was hidden.
  14. What are the titles? What it LOOKS like to me, is that they were likely hidden because the disclaimers were not quite right. You can still access them from your user panel, yes?
  15. Well... let's see Links articles as to what she did elsewhere... tvtropes.com Fan History Wiki yep, she matches all that exactly.
  16. I was thinking something even more specific... Depending upon the amount of stories per category that belongs to series. If they're not overly populated, I can create what you asked as subcategory, and move the pre-existing subcategories into it as sub sub categories. Dunno, gotta think about that a bit more, and I will probably end up applying that to other game series as well once we get there for sorting.
  17. Untitled (Anyone have any Ideas?) in anime, belongs in naruto
  18. Well, in archive this size, you sometimes have to look, and/or ask for recommendations. I think Keith or Acal might be more the kind of writers you're looking for. They're BOTH good writers. As to fic quality and such overall, if you think about what is seen as the purpose of this archive by the person who owns it, and those of us who help run it, then you'll understand why QC is not something we necessarily do. Jaxxy, for example, strongly believes in having an area to have an outlet for not only creativity, but being able to express that while LEARNING, and in an adult community. By that, (adult community) I'm referring to a community of people who are 18 or over. Not necessarily their story content. I completely agree with her on that. See, I can't write for beans either. But, that doesn't mean that I should, or WOULD discourage someone else from giving it a try. It takes GUTS to put your work out there for others to have a look at, and in many for instances, tear it apart. And yet, still be able to come back the next day and do it AGAIN.
  19. Multiple deletions of this user for posting trollfic, since spring of last year (2008). Just some examples of the "fiction" that has been repeatedly posted, in multiple subdomains. And deleted. And deleted. And deleted. You get the idea. I should point out that this one was deleted before under a different user name as well.
  20. Stained Class Judas Priest
  21. Swingers in Konoha belongs in naruto, not anime Love your next like yourself belongs in ne/german
  22. subcategory
  23. Reclaiming A Mate review board wordord review ID 3379
  24. older link newer link
  25. Forever and always very slight wordord, primarily in the punctuation. Missing It stretched slight wordord following first separator line Searching wordord throughout p1, slight p4-15, p17 Lovers Walk wordord p 3 Once and Again wordord, whole story A Very Ordinary Evil wordord, p 5, 7 The Watcher's Lesson wordord towards the end Cherished wordord halfway down the page Finding the Fire wordord
×
×
  • Create New...