DemonGoddess

Duplicate users 2008 42 total profiles found 23 profiles deleted total 3 users - no duplicate found 13 users - duplicates found, no data attached, duplicate profiles deleted 4 users - duplicates found, data attached, duplicate profiles merged Net actual users - 20 2009 19 total profiles found 11 profiles deleted 3 users - no duplicate found 1 user - duplicate found, no data attached, duplicate profile deleted 4 users - duplicates found, data attached, duplicate profiles merged Net actual users - 8 2010 189 total profiles found 111 profiles deleted 7 users - no duplicate found 44 users - duplicates found, no data attached, duplicate profiles deleted 30 users - duplicates found, data attached, duplicate profiles merged Net actual users - 81 2011 2757 total profiles found 1543 profiles deleted 25 users - no duplicate found 1004 users - duplicates found, no data attached, duplicate profiles deleted 213 users - duplicates found, data attached, duplicate profiles merged Net actual users - 1242 Shared/alternate accounts 2009 1 allowed alternate 2010 1 allowed alternate 1 allowed joint/shared account 2011 3 allowed alternates 40 allowed joint/shared accounts

Apollo and I got to talking about some things, and we were curious as to how it looked by year, rather than cumulative. So, I've been compiling this data per type of infraction I've been reporting previously in the update. As the data is stored in individual records, that's where I've gotten the numbers previously. Mind you, I'd forgotten that many of the earliest records, since I came on staff, had multiple instances per record. This is a far more accurate accounting of what was done, then the prior, as I'm going through these records one at a time. As I finish with a section, it will be added to this topic. The Moderation Status Update I normally post by the month, will now have a breakdown by month, with year to date totals end of each month. I'll be starting a new topic for 2012 following this format.

Should you find that you're suddenly missing a bunch of reviews, it's because I've been doing some clean up in the database. Approximately June of last year, it was discovered that my deletion utility was not deleting the attached data, when a minor was deleted, as it should have. Since then, I've been manually searching the database for the attached reviews, so that I can delete all the pre 18 content with the underage user. Apparently sometime towards the end of December 2008, the utility stopped working. I only found out the approximate time, due to statistic gathering. While I was doing that, I decided that with knowing the utility is not working correctly, it would be a good idea to double check the minor deletions. The deletions that were processed starting last week of December 2008, are where I started to find orphaned reviews from the underagers deleted at the time. So, I'm having to go through these record by record, to make sure I've gotten all the pre 18 content deleted from those past deletions. As of this evening when I stopped, I estimate I've deleted 2000 reviews over an 18 month time span. I've still got another 14 months of data to go through, so I expect this number to jump up greatly.

We'll be taking care of this, thank you for the notification

That's what it would be, is deletion of minors, primarily. Yesterday, when I was deleting them, a fair chunk of the kiddies had also left reviews.

Proof of age is not something that is required UNLESS WE ASK YOU TO PROVIDE IT.

thank you. wasn't sure if I got 'em all or not. That one is now adjusted as well.

I corrected the forum topic, and I got all the stories taken care of. Please double check me and make sure I missed none.

I this may be it. The Babysitter

yet another old deletion (before us)

Sorry to hear about this Melrick.

Sometimes things take a little more time than one might think they should, be that as it may, she is indeed working on this.

Do I have that linked to somewhere? I know it's an outdated mod and no longer ported in.

The Silver Snitch's owner is working on getting things back up. Please be patient.

I can (and do) adjust the posting date in the database. I have to, as the review dates would be before publication. This is why when someone re-adds for me, rather than me moving the stories; I tell them to leave the original loads alone. I need the date data (which is not displayed except in the db). As to the mythological stuff, if you base it on actual mythological characters, it should go to where those stories are in books.

The author and all her content were deleted as she was underage both at time of sign up and posting

It's actually in books. If you re-add them to books, and then tell me when you have, I can merge over hits, reviews and rates from the other table. Once you do the new add, let me know and LEAVE the original stories. I'll delete them when I've finished.

added

I can't find a reference where it was a staff removal, which means the author removed it. I see that often enough where an author takes something down to rework it. As the story was in originals, if the author is also published, and converted it in to work for publication, that's actually one of the more common reasons I've seen FOR an original fiction to be removed by an author, in those circumstance.

Hell, time permitting I still prefer to hang out my clothes to dry.

Nope, still no chapter search. With a database that's 8GB, and that mostly chapter data, that would be too much of a strain on the database itself, and slow things down tremendously. You'll be able to search members, story summaries and titles. The reason search with google does not work is because of the age verification form. What we've done for now, is relocated it, so when you first visit, it shows up when you click a chapter. That way, this should hopefully open things up for the indexers to work more effectively within the archive. Given that the database and archive is split, when wanting to search an original story, you need to be in the original subdomain for that search. Same for any other of them.

Wow! Lovely to hear from one of the earliest site members! Thank you!

deleted

If we still allowed the html upload, that would be handy. But, we've got CKEditor integrated and it imports the word files via copy/paste in a popup and parses out the garbage while retaining the formatting.

That applies to only if we ask you for it. When we ask someone to provide proof of age, we also give them a time frame to work within, and go from there.