Jump to content

Click Here!

Keith Inc.

Members
  • Posts

    1,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Keith Inc.

  1. Raisetheroof911 has posted some pretty horrible stuff, but someone seems to like The Rewards of Little Girls, here: http://cartoon.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600041053 , and posted it here: http://cartoon.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600090991

    In the reviews, NES4848 says: "Well I Tought I Would Have People Look At This Some More By The Way Its Not Mine Just Wanted To Have The Real Person To Have More People Read It & Leave A Review"

    Interestingly, the grammar and language skills of NES4848 seem similar to RaisetheRoof's.

  2. How do you deal with reviewers that have no sense of subtly?
    Many of my reviewers, here and elsewhere, do not share the fetishes i write for. If the review mostly centers around 'WTF is the deal with _____?' i find it easy to ignore. I mean, they're not who i'm writing it for.

    Then again, if fellow fetishers wax rhapsodic about a story, i can never be sure if i wrote a good tale, or if i just hit their desires right on the button.

    Some of my reviews have clearly missed something subtle i was trying to do, or a trick i was playing or trying to be cute. I do realize that most of modern entertainment puts in a lot of effort to make sure the audience isn't lost. Softballed plots, clear villains and simple moral depths. So if something goes over a reader's head it might be because they've been trained to sit back and wait for the plot to be fed to them. But it might be that i was being TOO cute. I do review what i did, how i did it, consider how i might fix it. I have changed a few things here and there from this.

    But often I have decided that i was happy with what i did.

    Which is mostly what matters, right?

  3. Actually, this entire thread has gotten sidetracked by you. Explain why there isn't media bias shown, when the media states that Bush's inaugural costs were outrageous, excessive and of poor taste during wartime (but 'good' economy)... But the same media makes no negative comments towards Barrack's inaugural costs during two wars and a deep recession? To me, that shows bias, plain and simple.
    Of course it shows bias to you. You're already convinced of the bias. Proving the premise of your argument is not the acme of skill in logical argument.

    But the cost per expected person in the crowd this year is less than was spent on Bush's inauguration, so what is there to complain about, really? That many more people want to be a participant in this historic event, and the city/state/federal forces are dedicated to keeping them safe from the terrorists that Bush's administration has created and/or invented?

    Sounds like something a 'liberal' media would be absolutely crowing about. That Barrack's more popular or that Bush has made it so dangerous...

  4. "Bush crowds: 300,000 people, 17.3 million dollars, about 60 dollars per guest.

    Obama crowds: 1.5 to 2 million people, 30 million dollars, about 15 to 20 dollars per guest.

    Media bias is a poor substitute for math skills."

    What about reading skills? In two articles it stated that the city was asking for $50m and Maryland was also asking for a significant amount. THAT's why the state of emergency was declared in order to release what they were asking for.

    Yes, but the bigger point is that you have to compare similar things. Throwing big numbers out without a break down of what's being spent on what is just meaningless.

    It is possible to isolate their specific request for an additional 15 mil, and what they're spending it on, and compare that to the 17 mil spent four years ago. It's not an outrageous request considering the increase in crowd sizes.

    If you can make any other comparisons wiht specific amounts, that might help your case. And maybe actually demonstrate some sort of media cover up. I mean, it just looks acceptable tome, and all you've shown is that numbers are big.

    BTW, Also in an article it was mentioned that the Johnson Inauguration was attended by 1.2 million people. Yet take what was spent on Johnson's, multiply by 2.5% yearly inflation. And it's still far LESS than Obama's.
    But that's only inflation. How much more expensive is security going to be, now that Bush's made 'the terrorist threat' so big?
  5. Here's the article on Obama.
    which mentions a money amount and not what it is being spent on.
    Here's a CNN article. But still - no one's complaining?
    I'm not sure what there is to complain on. It's the city trying to cover the city's responsibilities for the police requirements. Same as they'd do if it was a GOP inauguration, and there was this much jubilation planned.
    A Washington Times article, compares/contrasts w/Bush. Again, no complaining?
    "Preliminary planning for the inauguration had not taken into account the likelihood of unprecedented crowds, now expected to run as high as 1.5 million to 2 million people, Mr. Stanzel said. " What, exactly, makes this a media bias in that they're not complaining about people doing their jobs? Are you just jealous that Bush didn't have this many people dancing in the streets?
    Here's an article from 2008 which mentions the 'cap' on federal funds for inauguration (which was later conveniently bypassed by the 'state of emergency' thing) as well as the true total of $40m for the 2005 inauguration:
    That's what i've been saying. The party was 40 million, the security was 17.3. Based upon the expected number of guests, they're estimating the city's requirements for security this year. They're doubling the 15 million dollars the city gets for crowd control.

    Bush crowds: 300,000 people, 17.3 million dollars, about 60 dollars per guest.

    Obama crowds: 1.5 to 2 million people, 30 million dollars, about 15 to 20 dollars per guest.

    Media bias is a poor substitute for math skills.

  6. Depending on how I squint, cock my head sideways and glare at it, I sometimes think it's OK, but sometimes I think I've spliced past and present tense togother,
    You need to have a clear idea of where she is when she's saying this. Writing in a journal, talking to a friend, whatever. And next day, a year later, an afterlife review of the life, etc.

    That would give you a better grasp on how she's going to be referring to stuff in the past, her thoughts at the moment, her plans for the future.

    Memoirs are going to mix past and present text anyway. As long as it makes sense, then worrying about mixing tenses isn't so big a deal.

  7. My, that is some biased reporting. Yours, not the medias.

    You're comparing private monies spent (i would assume on the parties but no breakdown is given), implying that no federal funds were spent on Bush's Inauguration at all?

    Compared to federal spending this year, implying that no private funds are being spent by Obama's camp at all, again with no breakdowns?

    I think it's likely you're comparing apples and flatirons.

    You have to know that at least some federal funds are spent each and every four years. For one example, for the Secret Service's extra efforts to secure and maintain security at any and all parties the pres may attend. And lining the streets for the motorcades. Crowd control. Overtime and extras and a few people flown in from Cleavland, maybe.

    So maybe THAT cost should be compared to the 140 million, first of all? Any numbers on the federal funds spent in 2005, 2001?

    Plus, I'd say that the parties this year are going to make the last ten inauguration's look like rained out events. Many, many people are real excited about Obama and not because he's a democrat. More than a few would be just as excited if Powell had won on a Republican ticket. I wouldn't be surprised if the private donors monies being spent on the parties exceeds both of Bush's inaugurations put together. But maybe not. It's hard to be concerned, though, as you pretend this number doesn't exist either.

    So there will be a lot of parties, with a lot of high-profile people, many of whom would be very tempting targets for the increased terrorist threat that Bush and Co. have been getting so much mileage off of. More parties than most DC security forces are probably budgeted for. So maybe the $140M is being spent on renting metal detectors, barricades, hiring private security, overtime of federal, state and city security officers, and billeting for the army units being brought into the area for the day?

    Maybe?

    As i said, a breakdown would be nice.

    Comparing budgets for equivalent matters is the only way to go forward on outrage, here.

  8. Thanks for the feedback. A lot of the time I don't think about how the story will be perceived. I always know who 'she' is on any given use of the pronoun, but that doesn't necessarily mean everyone else will.
    It's a difficult task, conveying a story without the benefits of telepathy. Who's talking, who's taking action, who's the person talking to the other person about the other other person.

    This is one habit i've tried to form, to help get the scene across no matter what i'm writing about, so i don't have to wait for a reviewer to say that they had to read a paragraph three times to get the choreography down.

    'Cum' is used as an odd quirk really, so I can differentiate between when someone is coming into the room and when someone is coming from sex.
    Which brings up an interesting image of someone collapsing to the floor in ecstasy every time they turn a doorknob...

    Or someone qualifying for the sex Olympics as "He came into the room from across the hall. We were all impressed, we hadn't even heard him breathing hard."

  9. I hate to sound like I'm doing a self plug here, but would you mind taking a look at my stories? It was Accusations in particular that received the concrit. Here's the link:

    http://games.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600083789

    The reason I link this one even though it's the second in the series is that according to the feedback, the smut in the first one seemed to resolve conflict more. I didn't really think it was done improperly in the second story (otherwise I would have written it differently), but if it is indeed a matter of opinion I would be happy to know. Of course, if it's an actual problem with my writing I'd like to know so I can avoid it in the future.

    Well, the sex seems to rise naturally enough from character issues and opportunities, as near as i can tell. I think you're doing okay.

    I did notice two things. Pet peeves if you will. Just a couple of suggestions.

    'Cum' is a Latin term. Successful sex makes people come. It's easier to conjugate that way. I'm coming, I came, we all came together, I will make you come like a donkey with a five inch fire hose shoved in his asshole and the water turned on and off to the beat of an air traffic controller's heart...

    She looked down into the other girl's face and saw her looking back at her.
    And i try to limit the number of people that are referred to by a pronoun in one paragraph to one. keeps the reader from being confused by who 'her' is. "She saw her sneaking up behind her friend but she was apparently aware of her and was on her defensive." You can alternate the she/her or him/he between paragraphs, but not within a sentence.

    Try something like, She looked down into the other girl's face and saw the elf looking back at her.

  10. Well, even if you had something new, unique, unexpected and mind blowing each and every time, some critic would boil it down to 'demon tries something new and the warlock likes it.'

    It's possible that you're not repetitive, it's just that you aren't providing exactly what this reviewer wants/needs in the way of smut.

    I really think you need to be true to your characters, so if they're happy, your writing won't suffer. I do agree that you might consider changing how you approach/describe the sex, or in how much detail. But again, it's your story, so write what you think the narrative demands.

  11. I do think that the main characters that a fandom is built upon tend to be the reasons that people read fanfiction. I want to see continuing adventures of Kirk/Spock/McCoy, or O'Neill and Carter, or Blackadder, Baldrick and George.

    So writing stories about those characters is certainly more polite than eclipsing them.

    On the other hand, sometimes it's the setting that's compelling, not the characters. So a reason to WRITE fanfiction may be best expressed with an OC, because that way you can run around in that yard without getting a popular character wrong. Maybe you want to explore sex in a certain magical chamber or with a particular fantasy creature, but none of the characters already in the story would be true to themselves to participate.

    I had an idea for a sequel to Land of the Giants, and i frankly couldn't use any of the canon characters. They would not be very convincing cooperating with the giant government that pursued them for so long. So i populated the stories with OCs and made a few references here and there to the others.

    All in all, i think a well-written story can be made in almost any fandom, anywhere from 100% canon to 100% OC's. But no matter what you do, someone, somewhere, will interpret it as a betrayal of their favorite venue, as a violation of the purity of the original vision.

    I'm not really sure why such fragile people are on sites like this one, with no oversight or purity police to keep everyone true to the vision.

  12. Needless to say, loads of other things have kept me from maintaining certain things in forum. :throwup: DAMMIT.

    Well, can't speak for others, but i'd a whole lot rather that the archive works and idiots can be quickly deleted than that i have a four-digit-fighter medal or anything like that. No worries.

  13. IMO any author who puts a story up on AFF has a little voice in his head telling him that what he has written is worth the time of others to read and enjoy.

    Not sure if that's true. Look at how many put 'positive reviews only' or 'please be kind' in the summary? Or delete critical reviews?

    I think more than a few are not here to improve, want no feedback on their writing except those that agree in the potential of the pairing or the way the writer solved a problem the characters faced in one episode.

  14. I've thought about this before. Sometimes when I read a fanfic I really like I get inspired. Is it still plagiarism if you use the same idea but put your own spin on it?

    Well, that's pretty much essential fanfic. Playing with someone else's characters, settings, plots, universes... As long as 'something different' happens, it's an original (enough) story using, adapting or skewing someone else's. That might still be a copyright issue, but not plagiarism.

  15. Do you believe we should define which rights we have through a system of positive rights, or negative rights.

    Definitions:

    Positive Rights: Where your rights are rights which have been explicitly delegated to you.

    Negative Rights: Where you have the right to do anything not specifically prohibited.

    Limitations on what we can do are not rights. Rights are things that even the government cannot take away. A prohibitive list is specifically taking something away.

    I think the list of recognized rights is very important, but it's just as important to recognize that the rights specifically guaranteed are not the limit of our rights.

    Jefferson was against the Bill of Rights, as he feared that the expressed list would be taken as the entire list.

    I prefer the most open approach possible to rights, understanding that they only extend as far as to when they start to infringe on the rights of others.

  16. But your past self isn't really the same as your present self, either.
    Maybe not technically, but a lot more effectively than a clone.

    especially if the temporal gap is really small, like a day or a couple of hours.

    Still going to have the same turn ons, turn offs, sensitive areas, favorite fantasies, illicit memories, guilts, passions, scars...and the same 'time turner fantasy'...

  17. Well, there's no good Hermione/Hermione (timeturner) fics to my knowledge. And people especially seem to dislike underaged characters. Taboo sucks.

    This post inspired me. Seriously. I found myself fascinated by the potential, meeting yourself and seducing yourself.... Aside from the underage thing.

    I thought about trying to post it some time after Hermione graduates and starts on the post-graduate studies but i haven't read the last book yet and dislike playing in fandom i'm not strong in.

    So, i decided to move out of the specific universe of Harry Potter, though obviously inspired by it, so anything i get wrong i can just wink and say it was something i did on purpose to distance myself from HPU.

    Anyway, this is a female slash ficcie, an attempt to make at least a tolerable timeturner fic, without any more taboos than my usual kinks.

    http://original.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600099058

  18. Years ago i lived with a guy that used to date a stripper from one of the local clubs.

    Every so often she and her room mate would be low on funds, turn to my room mate and say: Hey, is that guy you're with still a virgin? Is he willing to pay to lose his cherry to two chicks?

    My friend would habitually rush straight home, ask me if he could borrow $50, then go back and sleep with the two of them himself.

    He never told me this until years after. "I thought you'd be intimidated." was his excuse for keeping it from me.

    I honestly don't know how i'd have reacted if i'd heard the offer. I do know that i regret never having had the chance.

    Tell her honestly how you feel about violence, maybe she knows a girl that isnt' into it, or can at least tell her friends to leave the whips home.

    Have fun. Take notes. be prepared to brag.

    Write it up for the site. Just make it Harley, Poison ivy and robin or something.

×
×
  • Create New...