-
Posts
1,891 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
104
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by pippychick
-
Oh, sod it.. I am back! Kind of… as work permits.
No, I haven’t written anything, but I miss being able to post status updates, which technically should count.
Warning: personal politics
So… this week. The only thing sadder than Trump still being President of the USA, is Tony Blair, war criminal, telling a group of people with cameras pointed at him that if only the British people rise up against Brexit, the government will have to listen to them.
That’s a little optimistic of him. Why, I seem to remember… it must be nearly fifteen years back, when a million people “rose up” to say: “Please don’t kill innocent Iraqi children, Mr. Blair!” And at the exact same time as we gathered in Hyde Park, Tony Blair was explaining to parliament why he would be completely ignoring us.
He also talked a bit about ‘direction of travel’ with regard to Brexit. Direction of travel, aided in part by him, is why we are in this mess. In some ways, direction of travel, aided in part by democratic presidencies, is why we are all in this mess. Direction of travel can be directly illustrated by the ever-widening gap between the rich and the poor, that these generations (from mine onwards) are less well off than their parents, the rise in street homelessness, the breakdown in social care, charging for doctors’ appointments, the americans who had their homes repossessed and could not possibly be bailed out for a few thousand (or even a few hundred), while the bankers who caused the misery got billions… and billions. I could go on… and on.
Back to Blair, it’s almost as if he paid someone to find as many ironies as possible for him to add into his speech, though we shouldn’t expect anything less from a man who was somehow – inexplicably – made middle east peace envoy despite causing unimaginable terror and suffering there. This is on par with making Trump a leader on women’s issues, or electing him a spokesperson for an alliance against police violence towards minorities.
Yes, I do believe Trump and Brexit are part of the same phenomenon. I’ve got to. I’m no fan of Brexit, I voted remain, but as I listen to Blair and I watch the insincere wringing of his hands, I almost hope it happens. Just to spite him. Just because it will force people to either wake up or drift further into the nightmare we’re all heading towards. I’m in the bottom third (and probably in the bottom third of that). I’ve got nothing to lose except everything, and if things stay the way they are – if the direction of travel continues – I’ll lose everything anyway. Right there. That’s exactly the sentiment that got Trump elected. It’s the sentiment that will see us leave the EU. I hope it’s not the sentiment that puts us (as I predicted a few months ago) on the wrong side of the next war in Europe.
People of Britain and the US, please, do wake up. You can be anti-establishment without being anti-humanity. It’s not hard at all. It’s as easy as putting yourself in someone else’s place and deciding you’ll stand with them. We’ve evolved for this.
Quite apart from all that, I don’t think the establishment mind Trump or Brexit at all, for all that people wish it. It kind of leads me to think they’re happy to use those things, as if the people have chosen their own diversion in a brand new game of misdirection, which leads to just one question…
What the hell are they trying to make off with this time?
-
Frightening, isn’t it? Misdirection is a lovely weapon, and I think it’s being wielded with an extraordinary finesse which belies the actual input of either our tangerine faced shitgibbon or the mendacious war criminal on your end. Neither of them is a bright enough spark.
There was a rather interesting editorial piece about Trump – Dana Milbank posited he actually thinks in tweets. It would explain a great deal.
-
Just read the Dana Milbank piece, and I think he’s probably right. The most obvious thing about tweets is that they are not a conversation, or even really part of one. They are just statments. Given Trump’s style, this suits him down to the ground. He can say what he wants, regardless of his own blatant hypocrisy, and never be bothered by the viewpoints of others.
I’d just like to add that despite potential commentary evidence to the contrary, I do believe in democracy. I just don’t think any of us have seen it for decades. I suggest Britain’s 1945 was just a blip. I believe in it, but I believe to have it – truly – and for it to be held accountable, we have to be willing to die to achieve it, and then defend it. Regardless of capitalism, truly accountable representative democracy would never allow the deep inequalities that exist in our nations, or in the world. In fact, delivering us from those evils would be most of the entire point.
-
-
Nearly all of my work is now deleted from the other place. I feel good about this. What couldn’t be deleted (giftwork) is orphaned, and I just have a small handful of co-written fic to deal with. Still haven’t figured those out yet. I will.
Unfortunately, my increased working hours are not even nearly over.
-
I am mostly not here.
But while I am here, if you’re not already aware of them, I would like to introduce you to the ‘I See You’ stories by comedian Sam Gore.
The Meryl Streep one is particularly good…
-
As the UK government ends a scheme requiring us to take in vulnerable unaccompanied Syrian children trapped in Europe, this quote now seems apt on both sides of the atlantic…
“The way a government treats refugees is very instructive because it shows you how they would treat the rest of us if they thought they could get away with it.”
Tony Benn
-
Wait, the UK were requiring people to take these in, as in driving up to a random house, and saying “congratulations, you’re now hosting a refugee?” Certainly, I could see some encouragement ($$$) for being willing to host a kid (and probably the best way for the kid, to have some stable adults in their lives after an ordeal). But a compulsory scheme could easily backfire...
-
No, Des… the amendment to the legislation was requiring councils to take a share, so that the children would be safe, instead of being sexually exploited and whatever else in Calais, where they are currently alone.
Councils called for volunteers, and there were reports of many volunteers, but no children were being allowed in for them to take in/foster. And now… they’re on their own.
-
Where I live, at local Labour meetings, there was talk of us using the ward pot to refurbish an old community centre that used to be an orphanage, providing a refugee centre that would be a safe space, council run. We were just waiting for children… but the government has left them there in France.
-