BronxWench

Okay. Where to begin? Cutting the hospital gowns makes no sense. If you've ever seen the typical hospital johnnie, they're open down the back. The medical personnel could just pull the gowns down off their shoulders. All abnormalities are odd. That's why they're abnormalities. Reproductive cycles aren't going to make panties wet. Only arousal or poor bladder control will do that. Humans don't go into heat, so I'm not sure how they'd jump to that conclusion, unless there was more revealed earlier to warrant that. If not, then maybe there needs to be more information put out there to justify the logic leap. You can't just squeeze a breast to make the milk express. It's a suckling action that stimulates flow, so you have to press on the milk ducts without just tugging or squashing the nipple itself. It's HARD, and that's why most women use pumps. But just squeezing a globe, mound or mountain won't do bugger-all. And just for reference? Breast size has NO bearing on how much milk a woman produces.

28222

28220

28217

If you're going to scale up like that, then yes, of course a C cup on a 22-foot woman will be larger. But proportionately, and that's the key, her C cup would be the same C cup that a 20 foot woman or a 24 foot woman would wear. Volume scales the same way height would, and proportion stays the same.

It's not really the cup size that changes, but the band size, the part that goes around our backs. But a C cup will look larger on a smaller woman, so a five-foot woman who's a 32C will look more generously endowed than a taller woman who's a 36C. If you're daring enough to venture into the lingerie section of a department store, you can look at the various sizes of bras, and you'll see that the volume of a C cup doesn't vary even for the bigger band sizes, (although it will be harder to find in bigger band sizes).

Read the last part of the post above. You need to go to the summary line, where I have the red arrow, and use the arrow keys on your keyboard to move to the end of that field. Then you have to type M/M by hand, and click the edit button to save the change.

For Culloch's Rest: Thank you! One of the hardest things about trying to do a flash fic series is getting sufficient detail into that very small word limit, while moving the story along with each 1,000-word chapter. I'm glad I'm managing to convey both environs and mood!

28210

28208

28205

BumbleBee, the very best wishes for a good report!

Okay, let's try one more time, with illustrations. I've used one of my stories for the purposes of making images. Please use your own subdomain info. Go to your Control Panel and select EDIT in the subdomain. You get taken to a new screen, where you can choose you story and what you want to do: Pick the title of your story, and then select EDIT DETAILS: You are taken to the next page: Click the dropdown arrow on the first field. See the highlighted choice? --Choose Category-- CHOOSE THAT: Once you choose that, the second choice disappears: Now, go back to the first category and re-select your fandom category - for you, Rurouni Kenshin. Then you can select a NEW second level category: To add tags, go to the field marked SUMMARY. Use the arrow keys to move along that line, until you get to the end. Then type in the additional tags that you need. You can't do a dropdown after the initial posting, so you have to type them yourself. I hope this is a little clearer now.

28202

28200

28197

Okay, this is the story, yes? When you go to edit the details, in the first field, select " --Choose Category--- " This will blank it out so that the second field disappears until you re-select your category, in your case, Rurouni Kenshin. Then you can select the new sub-category. I will point out that you will need to add a M/M tag based on the content in that first chapter. It may not be yaoi, but there is male on male sexual content, in specific, the blow job the child is forced to perform. So, while you are editing the details, use your arrow keys to move down the Summary field and add in M/M as a tag. Thanks!

28192

28189

This thread has a great many recommendations, some of which may fit your request.

28187

If you are in heat, lactation wouldn't necessarily be a by-product of that, since she's have to conceive, which would end the heat, before she could lactate. Strictly speaking.

Okay, we begin producing colostrum in late pregnancy. While we might not be "full" then, giving birth is what triggers the process of lactation. There are two stages to lactation. The first couple of days, you produce something called colostrum, which is thin, yellowish, dense with antibodies and helps immunize the baby to some extent. If a woman has any leakage prior to giving birth, it's colostrum. After a few days, the milk a woman produces thickens, becomes higher in fat content, and looks paler as she begins to express breastmilk. So, there's no way to answer your question. It's not a precise thing and varies from woman to woman, making it impossible to say how "full" she'd be after three hours. Given that a human infant can nurse every couple of hours, I'd say odds are she'd be engorged by three hours, and in pain.

Even lactating, we're rarely salute-able. Perky, erect, tight, hardened, pebbled... those all work for nipples as adjectives. As far as lactation, breasts swell, yes, but when you're full of milk, they're hard, and it's not sensitive, it's painful to be engorged. You need to let down, ie, express milk. You'll see the veins more clearly, or at least i did, and I leaked all the time. Nipples aren't sensitive in the sexual sense, but they are also swollen, can appear larger and that is when you might see the very peak look elongated, after the baby has fed. They do get sore if the baby doesn't latch right, and they can crack and bleed.

For the first, I'll assume you meant "globes" and not globs. The second is not bad, and the third is repetitive. I'd drop "large" since "voluptuous mountains" is enough to ensure that I'll think she's very well endowed. But yes, the third sounds bigger than the second. As to nipples... I have fairly large nipples myself, but even fully hardened and erect, I'd hardly describe them as "towers" or "like flagpoles." I might say something like "her voluptuous mountains rested proudly on her chest, her swollen nipples prominent." Do you see the difference? You don't want to make the readers feel like they should salute.