BronxWench

Those all are properly disclaimed. I'll make a note on our records that these are fine!

16638

16636

That disclaimer as you have it above certainly looks fine to me. Can you give me the name of the most recent story that you received a notice for, so I can check that one? Thanks!

Hi! The perks of the forum include being able to use the PM system, posting to all the threads and not only the open threads like this one and the search threads, and being able to access our shoutbox. It's free, and all you need to do is to have an archive account and complete the registration, which can be found in the upper right corner.

16632

16630

16627

16623

16619

16617

16615

16613

16611

16609

16607

16605

16603

16601

I have to say, I had one reviewer elsewhere who did the good, the bad and the ugly when he reviewed. He was harsh, exacting, and almost universally hated, and the first time he left me a review I read it twice, re-read my chapter and PM'd him to discuss some of what he'd said because it was utterly valid. I wound up actually enjoying verbally fencing with him, and while there were times I disagreed with his critiques as being purely opinion and therefore inherently a matter of personal bias, he made me think and grow as a writer. He could have been nicer, and he wasn't nearly as good a writer as he was a reviewer, but there was gold in his criticism. So, if I got a review like the one above, I'd re-read my chapter or story, and try to see it from the perspective of the reviewer. Even if I didn't agree fully, I can almost bet there'd be something in that review that would help me improve. Then again, I'm serious about writing, and I'm serious about improving my writing. But the idea of sandwiching concrit between layers of positive comments is a good one as a general rule of thumb. People are always more receptive if they don't feel defensive, and criticism tends to make us defensive, doesn't it?

16587

16584

16582

16580

16578