dazzledfirestar Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Someone with a gun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Any kind of gun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quamp Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Wouldn't insectacide be quicker (Plus not having a swarm of bees after you?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Is that legal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Wouldn't that depend upon where you lived and what kind of insecticide you were intending to use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsliver Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Pretty much, although I recommend DDT, safe and effective, and if it wasn't for panicking hippies it could be sold to Africa and cut down on respiratory diseases immensely. Wouldn't napalm prove more effective than insecticide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Probably. Do you want to help clean that up though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonhart29 Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Not a chance! Do you think a few governments (not to mention the residents) would have a problem with using Napalm within their borders to kill insects? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Possibly. Think the charred remains of their countryside would upset them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Most likely. The US government wouldn't care... can't we get them to do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WFK Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Probably so. But wouldn't the pesky locals protest via Woodstock II? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Are we only on Woodstock II?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonhart29 Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 I thought it was more like Woodstock IV. Am I incorrect (probably)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Maybe... I thought we were at Woodstock III... Is it sad that none of the other Woodstocks have lived up to the first one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Sad, yes. Unexpected, no. What is with the apathy of our civilization? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 *Shrugs* Why must construction be so loud? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonhart29 Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Because the noise let's their foreman know their working? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quamp Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Because it involves taking out frustrations by hitting things very violently. Would society be better if everyone was aloud to beat on something inanimate very violently now and then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WFK Posted June 19, 2007 Report Share Posted June 19, 2007 Who says you aren't? Norms? I'll give ya that. In the privacy of one's home, what should NOT be allowed I ask? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzledfirestar Posted June 19, 2007 Report Share Posted June 19, 2007 Anything that injures an unwilling party? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quamp Posted June 19, 2007 Report Share Posted June 19, 2007 Nonconsentual sex? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 An electric chair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quamp Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 ... And a few other things. So what should our next subject be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest echtrae Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Perhaps something non-emotional? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonhart29 Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 I'm all for that. But is there a subject that has no emotional appeal for anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.