Leonhart29 Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 No - I actually think you've got the right idea on that one. So - if I have a plot bunny that wants to screw all of my other plot bunnies does that mean I have a producer on my hands?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Sounds that way. What the difference between a plot bunny and a ski bunny?
Guest echtrae Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Perhaps a propogator would be a better word for such a bunny. But what bunny doesn't want to screw all of the other bunnies?
Guest echtrae Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Perhaps. But isn't the very nature of being a bunny the desire to reproduce, or at least make the attempt?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 That would be the definition. But does that drive have to only apply to other bunnies (ie puck bunnies [hockey groupies])?
Guest echtrae Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 I would think that different sub-groups of bunnies would be able to interact at some level. Would you agree?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 I would. Why am I reminded of a conversation in the "People above and below you" thread?
Guest echtrae Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 possibly because similar people, similar thoughts. How different does something have to be to be truly original?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Hasn't it all been done already?
Guest echtrae Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Pretty much, everything seems to be variations of some theme. Is it a bad thing to think that though?
Keith Inc. Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 If it's true, then recognizing the fact isn't bad. Wouldn't the real question be, always be, what you do with the information?
Guest echtrae Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 In my experience, that is always the question. What's the next question?
redsliver Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 I sometimes feel rewarded working pro bono. Are you pro bone?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Yes. Bones are very useful when standing, sitting... pretty much doing anything. Were speaking of a specific bone?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Ummm... the ones in ears are pretty cool. Do you know of a better bunch of bones?
Guest echtrae Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Pelvic maybe. Or did you have a different group in mind?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 No, not really. Are we ignoring the importance of muscles?
Guest echtrae Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Of course not, muscles are the actuators. But why are you evading the question?
dazzledfirestar Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Why do you think I'm evading the question?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now