All Activity
- Past hour
-
This just in: some school districts in the US are banning books about cats. Apparently, somebody needs to have a chat with the administration and tell them those books “aren’t about that kind of pussy.”
-
In the current political environment, can’t tell if that’d were supposed to be a joke that somebody took too far? I mean, do we really want to press on the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide while we’re at it? I mean, that stuffs deadly when inhaled, will eat through granite given enough time, and yet we provide it to our kids…. Sad times to live in TBH
-
- Today
-
Ghost-of-a-Chance reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
Ghost-of-a-Chance reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
45720
-
45719
-
BronxWench reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
BronxWench reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
45718
-
45717
-
Ghost-of-a-Chance reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
Ghost-of-a-Chance reacted to a reply to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
InvidiaRed reacted to a post in a topic:
Halloween 2025
- Yesterday
-
45716
-
45715
-
Desiderius Price reacted to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
45714
-
BronxWench reacted to a status update:
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes.
-
45713
-
The people who leave negative reviews on e-books reporting sex scenes are my heroes. It’s easy enough to filter in smut when you’re reading fanfiction, but the e-book writers get coy about it in their descriptions. If not for sex-averse reviewers, we’d risk reading a “spicy book” that never passes first base, get clam-shelled over the lack of smut, and have to go start a fight with our husbands or something. ...not that I’m speaking from experience, or anything.
But yeah. Someone left a squicked one-star review on a book I was considering. Granted, the review was just the word “sex” written three times – like they’re starring in a demonic possession porno or something - and shoop, there the book went. Right into my cart. I hope it’s filthy. People like that are heroes.
- Show previous comments 5 more
-
I’m guessing chat gpt has anti-smut filters too (think of the children….)
-
At the moment, chat gpt does have filters, but OpenAI is planning to relax and/or remove those filters for verified adult users, tentatively in December.
-
I can’t decide if that makes me cringe or flinch, or if it’s something in between. That could go wrong in so many ways. 😬
-
45712
-
45711
-
I worry I can’t contain myself to a short story though. Although that might be an interesting challenge. To see if I can do something that quickly. I once wrote a 30 page story (which is currently on AFF) in 48 hours. I’m all about the stamina.
-
Deadman reacted to a post in a topic:
Halloween 2025
- Last week
-
45710
-
45709
-
45708! While not as pure eight is decent none the less!
-
I look forward to your entry should you choose to do so
-
45707
-
A principle that I usually follow in most things. Or at least I think I do anyway.
-
Sounds good! People underestimate the K.I.S.S Principle. Keep it simple silly.
-
45706
-
45705
-
45704
-
Perhaps, although my initial feeling is that it’s not Halloween enough. My basic outline has a woman getting out of a sudden rain storm and happening upon a lone cabin with a guy inside. They ride out the storm together, both literally and figuratively. Many dark twists could be done from this.
-
45703
