dazzledfirestar Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Yes, my former boss. Have you ever worked for the devil? Quote
redsliver Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 yeah, I was his pitchfork sharpener, lousy hours and my coworkers were total dicks but it gave me some spending money during high school. Do you need a pitchfork sharpened? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Hmmm... yes, actually. Aren't you going to ask me why its so dull? Quote
redsliver Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Don't ask, don't tell and all that. Do you pay by the hour or by the job? Quote
Nanaea Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 I pay based on performance. Is that too subjective? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Not at all. The better the job, the better the pay. Would the labor board have a problem with that? Quote
quamp Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Only if some rich guy spreads enough money at the top levels. Is government by wealth wrong? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Absolutely because it excudes most of the population from the decision making process. What's the problem with that? Quote
redsliver Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Too many people on top, not enough on bottom and the whole system crumbles, and that's what our "friends" the dolphins have been waiting for. How did we become friends with those wily creatures? Quote
Guest echtrae Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Because we are the keepers of the tasty fish. Who's first? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Sure he is. What's on second? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 I thought Who was on first! Can't you see why this is a classic joke? Quote
Guest echtrae Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Definitely. Why, are you having trouble seeing it? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 No I get it. Was I pointing out the obvious again? Quote
quamp Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Yes, obviously. Why is it when a man drools over a hot babe in a bikini, it's sexist, but when a woman drools over a hot stud in boxing shorts, it's o.k.? Quote
Guest echtrae Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Sexism is wrong no matter what guise it pretends to be under. Was I the guy in the shorts they were drooling over? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 I don't know... this is the first I've heard about some guy running around in his boxers! Where'd he go? Quote
redsliver Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 because no one says "Babe" besides Johnny Bravo these days. Why don't some chicks dig being referred to as chicks? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 Because they're up tight snobs. What's wrong with being a chick? Quote
redsliver Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 same work, less pay What's great about being a guy? Quote
Guest echtrae Posted December 23, 2006 Report Posted December 23, 2006 The world is your urinal. Is that a selling point? Quote
redsliver Posted December 23, 2006 Report Posted December 23, 2006 its the crux of the argument. Did we even need to argue? Quote
Guest echtrae Posted December 23, 2006 Report Posted December 23, 2006 Not that I was aware of. Couldn't of been much of an arguement, could it? Quote
dazzledfirestar Posted December 23, 2006 Report Posted December 23, 2006 Depends who you ask. Ready for Christmas? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.