LaBibliographe

I've tried to edit several times, I've clicked on the "Edit Bio" several times and I always get the same result: Your bio could not be updated due to a server issue. Somehow my edit button just doesn't do anything... You said it works for you? LaBibliographe

Hello - Perhaps I'm not waiting long enough, but as of April 22, 2008, the word 'Recommended' in the 'Recommended Reading List' on my profile page is still spelled incorrectly. Just some feedback for you. Thanks for looking into the problem. LaBibliographe (in the Harry Potter section)

Would it be possible for whoever has put in the Recommended Reading section for all authors, to please spell Recommended correctly? As it stands now, the banner reads 'Recomended' which is incorrect. Thank you in advance for your help. LaBibliographe

Hello - I've read the post below and don't quite undestand what you are saying. You said, "OMC/OFC stories are in their respective pair type categories." What is a 'pair type category'? I do hope it isn't just the male/female category under Harry Potter because as it stands now, it has 106 pages, not stories, but PAGES of stories to wade through. If one is supposed to hunt for Snape/OFC stories, for example, one is now at the mercy of the author's summary to know if the story contains the characters one is looking for. I can see several stories where the summary tells the reader nothing about who is in the story, because the author thought the reader would know from its specialized category, to wit, Snape/OFC or Lucius/OFC - which has now been erased. If this is just a byway toward putting back the OMC/OFC categories you may disregard this comment. If you plan to leave all the OMC/OFC stories in the amorphous, gigantic Male/Female category then I would like to point out what a disservice it is to the readers. And to authors who depend on readers to find their stories with the characters the readers prefer. Please reset the OMC/OFC categories in the Harry Potter section so the readers don't have 106 pages of stories to scan for characters they want to read. I can't really understand why these categories were removed unless it was to make life simpler for the programmers. Should the programmers be the ones to decide how literary categories should be organized? Libraries fought this battle for years as technical types organized the world of information without understanding how people look for information. Please don't let that happen here. Thank you for letting me express my opinion and provide some views on how the site is used. I appreciate your taking the time to 'listen'. LaBibliographe http://hp.adult-fanfiction.org/authors.php?no=1296799417 labibliographe@yahoo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~