Jump to content

Melrick

Admin
  • Posts

    12,311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    192

Everything posted by Melrick

  1. 7033
  2. Actually, the Karen Fletcher case - about the website owner - was this year. She pleaded guilty on 7 August 2008: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/%5Cnews.aspx?id=19617 So it's very much current, and the fact that a conviction was reached means that it definitely sets a precedence, and large websites would be an even stronger target than the tiny one she apparently ran.
  3. Jaxxy, I don't know if this link provides any information that is new to you, but I'll let you look for yourself anyway: http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/faq.cgi#QID523 It talks about whether sexually explicit fiction has US First Amendment rights to free speech. The short answer seems to be... kinda. Also, I've been doing more poking about... I don't know if anyone has already mentioned this in a previous post, but in 2001 a guy named Brian Dalton was convicted and jailed for writing about child pornography. He spent 2 years or so in jail before he won the rights to have a new trial. The conviction was thrown out of the Ohio court because the law only covered acts involving REAL children. http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/%5Cnews.aspx?id=12799 That does set a legal precedence, but one problem is that this guy wrote the stuff in his own personal journal, with no intention of distributing it. So would the precedence still apply? This one will interest you the most, Jaxxy: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=17458 This is about how a woman running a website that contained fictional graphic stories involving minors was indicted on obscenity charges. She was convicted and sentenced to 5 years probation and 6 months of house arrest. And her website was positively tiny in comparison. To be quite honest, Jaxxy, if this woman wanted to take it further - and she was serious about it - then it sounds like she could indeed cause a LOT of trouble to come flying your way. I totally understand people saying "Don't give in!" but when it's your potential freedom at stake, you need to think VERY seriously about it.
  4. 7031
  5. 7029
  6. Melrick

    I Am...

    I am cold.
  7. 7024
  8. 7019
  9. 7017
  10. 7015
  11. 7013
  12. 7010
  13. 7008
  14. 7004
  15. 7002
  16. 7700
  17. 7698
  18. 7696
  19. 7687
  20. 7685
  21. 7683
  22. 7681
  23. 7679
  24. http://www.bchealth.com/services/birthcent...babynames.shtml http://www.20000-names.com/female_native_american_names.htm http://lowchensaustralia.com/names/natamnames.htm http://www.apples4theteacher.com/native-am...ames/index.html http://www.behindthename.com/nmc/ame.php http://www.native-languages.org/baby.htm <== That has interesting info about how many of the online lists give wrong interpretations of Native American names, or simply don't actually exist at all. Might be worth a read first.
×
×
  • Create New...