Sign in to follow this  
JayDee

Aussies: Your Simpsons toon smut is child pornography featuring "persons".

Recommended Posts

http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/latest/519803...ild-porn-judge/

Um, Wow.

I've never drawn any pictures of Bart, Lisa and Maggie myself and I'm pretty certain I haven't spent any length of time looking at 'em, but since I've written stories of adult simpson characters in NC situations, presumably this would also be a violation of their rights as "persons" or some shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, this judge decides child porn issues based on the reaction of the viewer. the idea being, i guess, that pedophiles wouldn't BE pedophiles if they never saw people, or anything that might be taken for people, ragging the nasty?

I prefer the view that CHILD porn be judged for its affect, or potential effect, on the child involved. The child thatperforms or poses is a concern. Ink that poses is not. Besides, Bart was eleven in, what, 1987? He's past his majority. Hell, Maggie was two, so she's 23 now. She certainly wears it well...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would they focus on real children being abused? That would like make sense...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The the Simpsons are now considered 'Persons' and are subjected to real life rules like child pornography, what will the law do next? Charge Homer with prolonged child abuse?

wow, you're right. I forgot about all of that. Don't forget about all those drunken in public charges and there's also child negelct for the times they left maggie alone with the t.v while they went out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are alot of problems with these child pornography laws in australia thats for sure. As a yaoi fan i'm in a bit of a mess at the moment, the latest yaoi release from japan anime wise happends to be shota. Under australian law this is kiddie porn.

Now i'm not saying i support child porn but arnt these laws here to protect children? If no child is harmed in the process then whats the harm? I'm not saying i go out there looking for shota or loli porn but theres a different between a cartoon/anime and something filmed live right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now i'm not saying i support child porn but arnt these laws here to protect children? If no child is harmed in the process then whats the harm? I'm not saying i go out there looking for shota or loli porn but theres a different between a cartoon/anime and something filmed live right?

right. there is a major difference between anime and real life. for one, anime is just drawn. and for another, real life, thats a completely different story on child abuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You Aussie's are getting super strict these days. I remember reading that they're trying to pass a law (if they haven't already) forbidding porn with small chested porn stars to be distributed, saying that it too is a type of child pornography.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shaking my head and snorting. Must be a plague of (Hum Smurf's tune) La la lu la la land etc. . . . going on down under in the legislating branch of their government. Anything to control the masses, and tell them what is or is not morally correct and be damned with the fact that it was not meant to be a child's cartoon. Narrow minds who think age 10 is the turn off the cartoons and never look at them again because you are too old is in operation on this one I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this