DragonGoddess
-
Posts
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by DragonGoddess
-
-
Never got an email to reset my password, and any attempts now showing that the link doesn’t work even after 30 seconds.
https://members.adult-fanfiction.org/profile.php?no=1296803199
-
Seems to be a few more that were posted there in wrong section. Also, seems to have wrong disclaimer on first two
http://hp.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600100136 – HP/Naruto Crossover
http://hp.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600100135 – Wrong HP Category
http://hp.adult-fanfiction.org/story.php?no=600100122 – Not a fanfiction at all, but instead using the story post to look for another story of a completely different category.
-
Thanks Bronx
Had another submitted today as well that I think belongs in Threesomes/moresomes. I don’t know if these people just purposely put it in the wrong section or its the default section for all, but it seems the Draco/Hermione section gets hit with them 3-4 times a month at least.
-
Story has been submitted for nearly 2 years now, and has been in the wrong location. I clicked the report button on it back when I first saw it about a year ago, but nothing ever was done, I even asked the author about it being in the wrong section, but still nothing. It is a crossover HP/Twilight story, but is listed under Draco/Hermione.
-
the rewriting can have the reviews merged...ive got all the copies of all the chapters on that one...never got around to removing the old one
-
The username i have on the main site is Drake63628 (Dragon Goddess) for pen name and I don't remember deleting this story at all. I left the site for years and just recently returned. I just wish i could find the story if its possible so i can continue it on my own.
here's the link to my profile on the main site
http://members.adult-fanfiction.org/profile.php?no=1296803199
-
I don't get why it was removed...I submitted it and then it was gone. I never receieved an email but I know it was on here, because I only posted it here.
-
The Disciples or something similar. Was posted under my username Drake63628 or Dragon Goddess...idk where the hell this story went, because it was here and now it's gone...I am just trying to find it so I can download the copy of it.
*Edit* I remembered the name, but cannot find the file.
-
I had a story written on here that was an original from 2010-2012 and it isn't listed in my stories at all and I cannot find it in the originals. Is it possible it was removed entirely? The story was about five gangs in Chicago running the city, and the central gang was ran by a girl named Alexia. It was posted in the Originals section and now I cannot find it at all. Is there any record of the story being posted here at all even?
-
you know that even our current fundementelstic bush adminstration and that site your talking about is not as bad as one site in particuler know as Godhatesfags.com! now that site is what i call backwords and evil!
Peace Out and May the furs be with you! WOOOOOO!!!
omfg...dont even start on that son of a bitch's family and their ?GOD HATES FAGS AND SOLDIERS AND WE'RE ALL AGAINST THE WAR AND ARMED FORCES" bullshit. Phelps and his family are the main reason I am glad I do not live in Kansas, because if I did, they'd have had a few molotov cocktails thrown into that church already...
I see those people as traitors to this country. They should be shipped to afghanistan and told to live in a mud house over there and fend for themselves. Since they hate the USA so much, deport their bitch asses to a country that hates us as well.
Let me quote these assholes website for some people to see what they post about people who have died...This is the funeral of PAUL NEWMAN!
10/27/2008
5:00 PM - 7:00 PM
San Francisco, CA
Davies Symphony Hall - Paul Newman Is In Hell 201 Van Ness Ave. We will picket your "Special Tribute" for Paul Newman. What the heck are you talking about, you fools. He lived a life of pure filth. From his desire to be a movie star to his personal life as an adulterer. You know full well that nobody had a CLUE who Paul Newman was until he played a drunken fag in Tennessee Williams' Cat On A Hot Tin Roof with the WHORE Elizabeth Taylor, then his acting career took off (as they say). You know full well that Joanne Woodard was NOT HIS WIFE. More importantly, you know that he sold his never-dying soul for a little bit of human praise. How sad, and how dishonorable an existance he lived. And how typical of DOOMED america to want to honour this fool. Well none of that can hamper the duty and job of the servants of the Living God. That's right, read that again, the Living God. He is the God of the living and NOT the dead. All you dead can bury your dead. Our job is to speak the words of truth to the LIVING! Pr 26:1 As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour is not seemly for a fool. Pr 26:8 As he that bindeth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a fool. Heb 10:31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Mt 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Mr 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? God Hates Paul Newman, and Paul Newman Is In Hell. If you follow his HORRIBLE EXAMPLE, you will shortly join him there. AMEN! -
Yeah, at least Obama has the right attitude. He may or may not get anything done, but at least he won't make dumb ass comments like changing the constitution to make sure gays can't get married or that all homosexuals will destroy American families and will go to hell. McCain is using the same hope and change promises, what makes you think the same thing won't happen to him? Hilary was shot down because of big money drug companies. We SHOULD have decent fucking health care goddamn it, but because we're so individually minded, we only care about our own paychecks, not those that don't have the money to have the chance at decent health. If McCain is elected, we will probably just have the more of the same. He may say that he's going to change thing, but he's a conservative, how much is he going to change? Obama is the wild card. Nobody really knows what he's going to do when he becomes president. He could send us to hell, but he could also do some real good for this country. Our economy, healthcare, energy, all suck. We paid a huge amount of money for the war and now we're paying for it, so I don't see how great the last administration was. Like I said, I'd prefer a president that wants to change things for the better and fails, than a president that won't even bother to try because of his personal beliefs.
I am going to say this, and hopefully some will also see why I am voting for Obama. I am 20 years old, and injured my knee three years ago in a school activity. I cannot, without the help of a cane and sometimes using a wheelchair, walk around my house due to my injury. I recently attended a session with my doctor and was told that after 2010 my insurance coverage is being cut off for my injury, due to the government not supporting it more than 5 years. I know that if McCain is voted in as president, I can expect my coverage appeal to be denied in 2010. Having Obama as president stands the possibility of giving me a chance to not only get a job even with my injury, but also have medical coverage if I am unable to afford it. I would rather take my chances on something new, than go for something that has landed the USA in 10 trillion in debt over the last 8 years.
-
Good god, click the fucking picture people. it's the campaign slogan of Cthulu for President.
Some of us cannot see that picture...atleast I cannot...I get this message...sorry, but you do not have permission to use this feature. If you are not logged in, you may do so using the form below if available.
-
because fighting a losing war sucks and Palin's sort of evil is one that is neither sexy or borderline acceptable. At least for me. A guy that's on a power trip and high on himself vs. a guy who backs a woman that goes against everything I believe in, like, rape is a bad thing and the government should have absolutely no say in what people do with their bodies. Yeah, Obama's an asshole, but I don't have the overwhelming desire to stab him in the eye. Nadar's great, but, it's highly unlikely that he'll become president and I'd rather Obama than McCain. I have yet to hear something about Obama that makes me go 'ok, there's no way in hell I'm voting for that guy!' Palin's... beliefs... have made me have that reaction. And don't preach to me about how she isn't going to become president, because I don't see McCain coming out and saying that he doesn't believe what she believes. I have relatives that are gay, hell, I'm a lesbian myself, and I seriously doubt we're going to get any rights with McCain in power, and I also know quite a few women who have had abortions that have saved their quality of life, both physical and mental.
Since you brought up you being a lesbian, let me state that Obama is all for gay rights, because I asked on the website, since I am a lesbian as well.
“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.” — Senator Barack Obama
Here's what John McCain states about the issue though:
Republican John McCain says same-sex couples should be allowed to enter into legal agreements for insurance and other purposes, but he opposes gay marriage and believes in "the unique status of marriage between and man and a woman."
Sarah Palin believes in the same thing. Her stance on abortion is appalling as well. I personally am voting for Obama but I only vote for him to help keep McCain out of office. I am tired of republicans sitting in the oval office and being assholes about it all.
-
You know, the 9/11 terrorist attacks were attempted 9 times under the Clinton administration. It was caught and stopped all 9 times. The first time it was tried under the Bush Administration it succeeded. Why? Only those actually involved can say for sure. Of course that event led us to where we are now. I see Bush for what he is, a power hungry opportunist. Gatta love Porkchop and people like him that believe Bush and his people are telling the truth. There minds won't be changed until the ultimate betrayal of their trust happens.
I agree with Porkchop that yes, there are facts that were given about 9/11 that cannot be disputed, but, there are facts from both sides that cannot be disputed either. As for what you said about the first time this happened with Bush, it succeeded, let it be a reminder that Bush was at a school at the time of the attacks, and as stated in the news, there was no way to know where the planes were headed.
When the planes turned direction there was no set path as to where they were headed, and even the "conspiracy people" said that there were fighter jets ready to take the plane out, but the order was never given. Yes, the jets were ready to take out the plane, but to make an attack on US soil like they were supposed to, they could not shoot the plane down immediately. "The approaching fighter doesn't immediately shoot down the bogey: It can first rock its wingtips to attract attention, or make a pass infront of the plane, or fire tracer rounds in its path." It also can talk over the radio to the plane as well, which obviously wasn't mentioned. If there was no reply, they would most likely try another option then get confirmation for an attack. The people at NORAD knew the plane was hijacked, but had no idea of where the airplane was headed until after the first attack, which gave them some idea for the 2nd plane, but they also did not mention the third plane as well until 29 minutes later, far too late for anything to be done.
Here's the timeline and some facts that I found online that seem kind of unexplainable though.
American Airlines Flight 11 was flown into the World Trade Center's North Tower - 8:46 a.m.
United Airlines Flight 175 was flown into the World Trade Center's South Tower - 9:03 a.m.
American Airlines Flight 77 was flown into the Pentagon - 9:37 a.m.
The F-15A has a Cruise Speed of 466,79 Mph and a maximum speed of 1649,75 Mph.
According to a news release from NORAD on September 18th, 2001, the FAA notified them about the hijacking of the first airliner (flight 111) at 8.40 AM. Subsequently they ordered to scramble two F15’s from Otis Air Force Base at 8.46 AM, which were airborne at 8.52 AM.
Otis Air Force Base is 153 miles away, which means the planes would have taken a max of about 10 minutes to get to the 2nd plane if going at max speed, which they were said to have been doing, but they were there in 18 minutes instead.
I'm not stating something was a conspiracy here, but these are facts stated by FAA/NORAD commanding officers. I looked at both sides, and there are facts from each side that have facts in them that do not stand up to calculations and or basic knowledge.
-
All the previous statements about FF.net taking off the NC-17 content is true, and like Solaris and Shinju said, it was in 2002 that they deleted the content. I was posting my stories on FF.net at the time and they deleted them all, claiming they were inappropriate for the site, so I moved them all to AFF.net after it was started. I've since then refused to post on FF.net due to constant changing of rules and regulations on stories, and continued to post here!
-
I know this is an old thread, but I haven't been able to post on here yet to state my opinion on it. *raises hand* I agree that the epilogue was unnecessary. It seemed rushed, and like I really cared who married who, or what the kids names were! JKR should have left the epilogue out. I even refused to read it for 3 weeks because I liked how the story was without it. Then when I read it I was like, 'Oh wow, no news to me!'
As for Dumbledore being gay, weren't the damn robes with the moons and stars and all that on them enough of a clue?!
-
I am suggesting email notifications for the forums for whenever the news section has a new update. This does not mean subscribing to that forum and receiving email notifications that way. This could be useful to those who do not frequent the forums as much, and have accounts here, but also want to be updated on the news for the forum and archive. I'm actually surprised that this feature for members is not activated yet in the settings.
-
As a green party voter who plans to actually vote for one of the two candidates, and from what I have heard from both arguments, I am seeing more and more of the Bush administration show through McCain and Palin, and more of the Clinton administration show through Obama and Biden.
Yes, John McCain is older than most average president ages, but Biden is also in his 70's as well, at the age of 72. If you look at the experience in both series as well, you see that Palin only has a Mayor and Governor position, while the other three have senator positions and each of them has dealt with making laws, and representing a LARGE majority of people.
Palin was the governor of a state that has an average population of roughly 700,000. The average population of the USA is roughly estimated at 305,000,000. Going from such a small number to help represent the country and its population that is over 300% more than that, is beyond belief.
Everyone keeps saying "Obama isn't experienced either" but keep it in mind that Obama has been in the senate for almost 4 years, and has been working with law and government positions for nearly 20 years total.
Palin has only been in office for nearly 16 years total, and "Palin has described the Republican Party platform as "the right agenda for America," because of its "respect for equality and respect for life and an acknowledgment that it is individual Americans and American families who can make better decisions for ourselves than government can ever make for us," and has stated that "individual freedom and independence is extremely important to me and that's why I'm a Republican." *quoted here*
Going back to the first post made about her position, I see this as hypocritical to what was said there.
-
What I meant when I referred to 9/11 was that it was a scare tactic to show the USA that it is not as invulnerable as it seems, and Bush used the opportunity to turn the tables and go after the country and man his father originally went after.
As for terrorism, yes, the USA will not attack men and warriors surrounded by women and children, but yet they will allow our guys to be shot at and killed. Even while the terrorists video tape them decapitating and killing our soldiers and civilians in their own country to show us they are not backing down, we fight them still, but the generals have said we are not winning, and Bush still thinks we are.
With the views put in the American minds since 9/11, any arabs living in the USA is seen as a terrorist, and it is sickening, but if the person immigrated from one of those countries recently, there is no way to tell if they are a terrorist or not as well, so being on the watch can either damn or improve this country in the process.
The attack on the mosque was obviously a hate crime, but to pull in a political stand point is beyond ludicrous and completely uncalled for. It was a simple attack on a group of immigrants that were not considered "socially acceptable" in the eyes of the person who caused the incident. To say McCain was behind it is like saying Bush also was the one who organized 9/11 and all of that and the wars completely before he got into the office just to fuck this country over.
-
Personally, I see this as another scare tactic in the time of an election. Those people were refugees fleeing a war, and came to the country that is fighting against their own people. Does this condemn them to a life of hate and violence being thrown at them? No, it does not, but take a look at history and you will see a very similar circumstance. Back in the 60's and 70's when blacks were fighting for their rights, they were attacked night and day because they were who they were and were discriminated against by everyone. Crime rates doubled in just those ten years in Alabama from 1,222 incidents on various occasions in 1960, to 2,479 in 1970. Violence increased from racist attacks and the government pushing scare tactics at the time
The US government made it known in 2001 that they were going after Afghanistan, but then suddenly turned away from them and went to Iraq instead. My question is why make plans to attack one country, then not even three years later, turn a blind eye to that country and go after another country that had no prior reason to be attacked, except for the leader being an enemy of the President's father, and being suspected of having weapons of mass destruction? It is quite obvious when you look at it that President Bush meant to originally go after Iraq in the first place, but if that is so, then how is it that the country comes under an attack in the same year that Bush becomes president?
Either way you look at it, it is a scare tactic of some sort. Whether it be someone who wants to scare those people into going back to their homeland because they are racist, or it being just because they want to keep them in fear while living here just for the hell of it, it is a scare tactic.
As for fighting terrorism and destroying it completely, that is completely impossible. Anyone can be considered a terrorist by anyone else. To be classified as a terrorist there has to be the use of violence and threats to intimidate and place fear upon a person. If you are racist against someone and attack them to strike fear into them and their family/friends of the same race/religion/beliefs you are considered a terrorist because of this. Terrorism has been around forever, and it will always be around no matter what form it is in. If you intimidate someone or simply make them fear you, they are a victim of terrorism.
-
The one thing I do not like about the disclaimer issues is that I personally have been told my disclaimer was fine by an admin and then three days later a mod comes in, and specifically states what is needing to be changed. Over the past 3 months I've been told my disclaimers are fine, then someone else says it isn't, I change it again to be fine again, and the admins change the rules on the disclaimers once again. I'm being blunt, but admins make up your damn minds and revamp the entire disclaimer rules set and stop changing the rules on the disclaimers every other day. Those of us who are authors get tired of it day after day when we are trying to post for a reader's enjoyment, and not be hassled by what a disclaimer says. Make a set list of what needs to be included in the disclaimer, and stop bs'ing around with us about what needs to be changed...
If I am correct then the following two points are what need to be included in the story disclaimer's correct?
1. State the rights of the original writer and/or corporation that has rights to the story's characters and settings in the story. If the story is an original story you have written without using sources from other stories, please state so in your disclaimer.
2. State you make no profit off of the story and post it on the site for free at your own leisure.
If this is all that needs to be included, state it and please stop changing it. I highly doubt anyone will be suing the site and/or the writer's on it for copyright if these two points are included and posted in the disclaimers. I mean no disrespect, but it comes to a point where some of us, myself included, find it to be complete bullshit that we constantly have to change our disclaimers when just a week ago we were told it was fine.
-
Green for me. I like black, silver, and red as well, but green mainly is my favorite.
-
Rereading my Harry Potter books, and then starting on Everything's Eventual by Steven King. Not to mention my random fictions on here!
-
I'm not one to particularly read a story with the main character as a hermaphrodite all the time, but the idea does intrigue me and I have read a few stories in the past. To me a story involving such a character adds a uniqueness to the quality in the story and takes you from the normal M/M M/F F/F spectrum and tosses you into a more detailed series.
I am a writer, but I would never write one of those stories because...trying to word this properly...because it's not my style. I mainly write M/M M/F and F/F stories. I admit, I've attempted writing a story with a hermaphrodite character, but I didn't like the way it turned out and started over on the story changing the character to just being a male.
Being gay myself, having dated a transgender woman who wanted to have herself made into a man, and having a friend who is a herm, I understand what it is like since him and I *the friend prefers being referred to as a man* both have discussed this, and I have read fanfictions about this to try and understand it more as well. I see it as someone's personal choice to read a story with such characters, be it for understanding or for pleasure. Either way, the character is still a human and will be viewed as a normal person, albeit them having an extra part. As stated earlier, this just adds unique qualities to the story. Am I for a herm character in stories? Yes as long as its not completely insane and gross with how it is written.
READ ME: Validation/Password Reset Issues
in Archive Tech Support
Posted
I tried to get my email to work again, did a password reset, but still the reset is not working. I lost the original email that was sent to me, so I need a new one. The profile link and email are the following:
https://members.adult-fanfiction.org/profile.php?no=1296803199
forsaken_soul63628@yahoo.com