Aurora Moon
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Aurora Moon's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
0
Reputation
-
I imagine that it would be possible, yeah.
-
It just seems like there's idiots on both sides of this coin with that whole confusion over the nudity art vs porn thing. on one side, you got your pundits who's completely convinced that all forms of nudity is sinful and shameful, thus being on the same level as porn. then on the other side, you got idiots who think EVERYTHING is art... even the super-sexualized images out there like what you described. they try to justify it with saying there's some deeper meaning or some such thing. I suppose this is why we can't have nice things, huh?
-
Ha! I would like to see how it would interpret half of my dreams. I'm a lucid dreamer, so I usually can have a great deal of control over my dreams. however there are times when I don't have any control over my dreams, and it's where it gets REALLY weird. it's like my subconscious's a fanfic writer who doesn't know the meaning of restraint or unable to stop writing a story even when it's clearly a stupid idea. like this dream I had two days ago:
-
I don't mind artistic nudity.... but It also irks me that people can't seem to tell the difference between artistic nudity AND porn. After all, tastefully done artwork that has naked people tend to look like this: http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Mythology/RM/VenusAnadyomeneIngres.jpg (painted image of venus) http://www.howarddavidjohnson.com/scan0001a_copy.jpg (naked girl with flowers in front of her to hide her boobs) There's tons more out there that actually have artistic merit. there's some that might be interpreted as slightly risque, but were CLEARLY not intended for sexual gratification of the viewer. Any time a naked image seems intended to be competely sexual in nature, then it's porn. simple as that. A lady or even a bunch of naked guys bathing in a river, for instance, could be sexually arousing to somebody out there, but such a image wasn't made with the intent to arouse everyone out there. so therefore such a image would then be called art. I'm pretty sure everyone would agree with that?